The Trophy suite

One workflow. Four tools.
Built for the moment before you build anything.

Every tool in your MedTech stack — your QMS, your PLM, your requirements management system — assumes someone already did the hard work of figuring out the right problem to solve, the right user to solve it for, and the right requirements to capture that intent. Trophy is that someone. Four connected tools that take you from raw clinical insight to a submission-ready requirements package, in the order the work actually happens.

01
Trophy FINDER
Discover, quantify, and articulate high-value clinical and operational problems worth solving. Start with evidence, not assumptions.
02
Trophy PORTAL
Map the clinical users, economic buyers, and key opinion leaders whose requirements define success — and identify the internal champions who will carry the product to market.
03
Trophy TRACE
Fuse FINDER and PORTAL insights into a complete requirements and risk management framework. AI-generated, conflict-detected, rationale-documented, and exportable into your QMS or PLM on day one.
04
Trophy VISION
Give leadership a live view of portfolio health, investment allocation, residual technical risk, and ROI across every active program.
Where Trophy fits in your stack

Trophy is additive, not competitive.

Your QMS and PLM stay intact. Trophy gives them better inputs — the right problem, the right audience, the right requirements, cleanly exported into whatever system your team already uses.

Capability QMS (e.g. Greenlight Guru) PLM (e.g. Windchill, Arena) TrophyMed
Manages your quality processes✓——
Stores your DHF and DMR✓✓—
Discovers the right problems to solve——✓
Maps stakeholder requirements——✓
Detects requirement conflicts before design——✓
AI-native requirements generation——✓
Starts from the customer's problem——✓
Exports into your QMS and PLM——✓
01 · Clinical Problem Assessment

Trophy FINDER

Available now

Before you pick a requirement, pick the right problem. FINDER turns messy market scans, stakeholder interviews, and whiteboard sessions into a ranked portfolio of opportunities worth building.

Request 14-day trial →

Problem discovery framework

Structured problem statements with standardized evaluation criteria — market size, competitive density, technical feasibility, strategic fit. Not another spreadsheet; a system.

Compare-and-rank

Score problems side-by-side with weighted criteria your team agrees on. See which opportunities hold up under scrutiny and which fade when you look closely.

Trophy

Promote to TRACE

When a problem wins, one click creates a Trophy TRACE project seeded with its value proposition, stakeholders, and early-stage context. No re-typing. FINDER and TRACE share a spine, so the work flows forward instead of getting re-entered.

Why it matters
Most MedTech programs fail at problem selection, not execution. Teams commit 18–36 months and $2–5M building the wrong thing because the initial problem was never pressure-tested. FINDER makes that pressure-test a repeatable step, not a series of hallway debates.
Feeds into PORTAL and TRACE. FINDER outputs feed directly into PORTAL and TRACE — no re-entry, no lost context.
02 · Customer & Stakeholder Intelligence

Trophy PORTAL

Available now

A systematic way to identify, research, and activate the clinical users, economic buyers, and champions your product needs. The people intelligence your CRM doesn't capture because they haven't bought anything yet.

Request 14-day trial →

Publications

PubMed search tied to the customer — title, journal, year, authors. AI relevance filtering disambiguates namesakes so you're always reading the right person.

Payments

CMS Open Payments data pulled live. Year-by-year general + research totals, top companies, top yearly sponsor. Industry relationships in one glance.

AI publication analysis

Topics of interest, how their research has shifted over time, and where it's likely heading next. One click per customer.

Co-author graph

Pulled from PubMed automatically. One click adds a frequent co-author as a new HCP in your database, keeping the relationship graph you've been trying to track on sticky notes.

Interaction Preps & Synced Notes

AI-drafted interview guides and observation templates anchored to the customer's profile, publications, notes, and the specific project you're prepping for. Editable in-app, exportable to PDF/Word, attachable — so the prep, the edited version, and the transcript all live together.

Patent search

Patents lookup tied to the customer. See what they've filed, what they're named on, and which areas of the IP landscape they're active in.

Trophy PORTAL — Dr. Taylor Hart · HCP-042 (example customer)
HCP-042 Dr. Taylor Hart — Interventional pulmonology (example customer profile) Active · 3 projects
Publications 32 papers · topics: robotic bronchoscopy, peripheral lung lesion biopsy, navigational ENB 18 high-relevance
Payments $48,200 general · $12,400 research · top companies: Acme MedTech, Orion Surgical last 3 yr
Preps Interview (JTBD discovery, robotic bronchoscopy) · Observation template (peripheral biopsy) 2 generated
Feeds into FINDER and TRACE. PORTAL stakeholder maps and champion profiles attach directly to FINDER problem analyses and TRACE requirements as rationale.
03 · Requirements Intelligence & Risk Management

Trophy TRACE

Available now

Catch the $300k mistake before it reaches your FDA submission. Value-prop-anchored requirements, AI-native drafting, proactive conflict detection, and design controls that hold up on an audit.

Request 14-day trial → ROI calculator
◉

Value-prop-anchored traceability

Start with the job your product does, not an empty row. Customer Requirements → Product Requirements → Test Methods link automatically and stay visible end-to-end.

✦

AI-native generation

JTBD-driven customer requirements. EARS-format product requirements. INCOSE-quality acceptance criteria. Generated from your product context in seconds, reviewed the way you would review them.

!

Proactive conflict detection

Two requirements that contradict each other don't wait for DV to get caught. Trophy TRACE flags them when they're written, with the reasoning spelled out.

◐

PR achievement scores

Live readout of where every product requirement is — draft, in review, traced, verified. No more "where are we on DV?" in the Monday stand-up.

↗

Explore to Execute

Explore (pre-design-control) gives early-stage teams practical outputs ("n=5 and a rationale"), not premature regulatory theatre. Execute (design control + beyond) unlocks Gauge R&R, TMV, and statistical sample sizing on demand. Your team moves between them when it's ready — not when a checklist decides.

⚑

A DHF foundation you trust

Full change history, rationale capture, and signed-off status on every row. Design History File output is a side effect of working the way you were going to work anyway.

Trophy TRACE — DemoProject.traceproject
CR-003 Clinician shall insert the device with a single hand. ✓ Verified
PR-008 Insertion force ≤ 12 N across 90% of anatomical range. In review
PR-009 Device operable with one-handed grip in gloved conditions. ✓ Verified
TM-002 Bench test, n=30, simulated clinical fixture (ASTM F2502). Draft

Coming from spreadsheets Startups · Consultants

  • ✕Rationale disappears with the last engineer who left — requirements sit in cells, the "why" sits in nobody's head.
  • ✕No traceability you can defend — a CR → PR → verification chain in Excel breaks the moment someone adds a row out of order.
  • ✕Conflict detection = manual review. You find the contradictions during DV; Trophy TRACE catches them on day one.

Coming from Jama / DOORS Growth-stage · Enterprise

  • ✕Paying $30k+/yr for a 2010-era workflow. Incumbents have bolted AI on; none of them generate requirements from your value proposition.
  • ✕Best features sit behind enterprise tiers. You pay for seats and re-pay to actually use them.
  • ✕Deployment takes weeks. Projects take hours. Heavy tools optimize for IT; Trophy TRACE optimizes for your next design review.

A requirements error costs 10× more at every stage you miss it.

The spreadsheet doesn't catch the gap. It stores it faithfully until it detonates somewhere more expensive. "Rule of Ten," industry standard.

Caught atCost to fix
Requirements (Trophy TRACE)~$100
Design review~$1,000
V&V testing~$10,000
FDA submission (AI request cycle)~$100,000
Post-market (recall / field correction)$1,000,000+
Exports into your existing stack. TRACE exports to Jama, DOORS, Windchill, Arena, Greenlight Guru, or any QMS via CSV, ReqIF, Word, or PDF.
04 · End-to-End Portfolio Visibility

Trophy VISION

Coming soon

A live view of every active program — Explore through commercialization. Residual technical risk, requirement maturity, stakeholder coverage, and where to pull back or double down.

Join early access →

Portfolio health at a glance

Every active project scored on requirement maturity, open conflicts, residual technical risk, and stakeholder engagement. One screen replaces the monthly status deck.

Investment-vs-risk view

Projects plotted on dollars-to-date vs. residual risk. See which programs are on a healthy trajectory and which need a de-risking push before the next funding milestone.

Coverage gaps

Projects with thin champion coverage, or customer interviews older than 90 days, or requirements without verified test methods — surfaced automatically, without a manager chasing them down.

Built for leadership
VPs of R&D don't need more disconnected dashboards. They need one that pulls from the actual work in real-time — FINDER's problems, PORTAL's stakeholders, TRACE's requirements — instead of reconciling three separate reports. VISION is that one view.
Live data from TRACE. Vision pulls live data from active TRACE projects — no manual reporting, no separate data entry.

Start with the tool you need today. Grow into the suite.

Trophy FINDER, Trophy PORTAL, and Trophy TRACE are live now. Trophy VISION is coming. One bundle price; every tool included as it ships.

Request 14-day trial → See pricing Book a demo
Or email directly.